Pigs in Space: Modeling the Spatial Structure of Hog Production in Traditional and Nontraditional Production Regions

By B. Roe, Elena G. Irwin, Jeff S. Sharp. 2002

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Integrating spatial dependence into stochastic frontier analysis (2012, background): “Roe et al. (2002) also estimated their models using different cut-off distances and highlighted that the appropriate cut-off distance is an empirical issue.”
Spatial dependence in the adoption of organic drystock farming in Ireland (2015, background): “We follow Roe et al. (2002) in the approach that we assume that beyond a certain distance a spatial effect does no longer affect the adoption of organic farming.”
Integrated crop and livestock systems in Western Europe and South America: A review (2014, background): “…benefits: it facilitates the rapid circulation of information and the development of technical, organizational and product-related innovations, as has been demonstrated in the case of pig production in France (Larue et al., 2011), Denmark (Gaigné et al., 2012) and North America (Roe et al., 2002).”