Women in Academic Science: Experimental Findings From Hiring Studies

By S. Ceci. 2018

47 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3095f95ad65f4a09b02918bc00fcd99728690307

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Steve Stewart-Williams
2. L. Halsey

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Beatrice Avolio
2. Steve Stewart-Williams
3. Carlos Vílchez-Román
4. Jessica Chavez
5. L. Halsey

In Safety Research

1. Beatrice Avolio
2. Steve Stewart-Williams
3. Carlos Vílchez-Román
4. Jessica Chavez
5. L. Halsey

Citations in the corpus

• Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? (2020, background): “On the contrary, they are generally more likely to be (Ceci, 2018).6 This is the opposite of what we would expect if there were pervasive antifemale bias in STEM.”
• Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: a literature review (2020, background): “…the low participation of women in math-intensive fields is due to (1) women preferences, (2) women with strong math skills are more likely to have good verbal skills, which provides them with a wide range of career options and, (3) women with children are penalized in promotion rates (Ceci 2018).”