The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firms' Innovation Activities

By Matthias Almus, Dirk Czarnitzki. 2003

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30899d6da6a5e251700272a99b5cc4e4e2d41b13

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy (2006, methodology): “In the following, the indicators and values for the endogenous variables (publicly sponsored promotion, R&D and 5 Innovation expenditures were used already by Czarnitzki (2001); R&D was used by Almus and Czarnitzki (2003) in a similar context.”
The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis (2015, methodology): “Prominent methods that ave been used to account for sample selection are matching methds (e.g., Czarnitzki and Fier, 2002; Almus and Czarnitzki, 2003; zarnitzki et al., 2007; for heterogeneous treatments), instrumental ariables methods (e.g., Wallsten, 2000), and selection models (e.g., usom, 2000;…”
Do financial constraints threat the innovation process? Evidence from Portuguese firms (2011, background): “On the other hand, the effects of public policy, and specifically subsidies, on R&D spending and innovation performance, have been given particular attention in recent years (Bloom, Griffith, and Van Reenen 2002; Almus and Czarnitzki 2003; Aerts and Schmidt 2008; Schneider and Veugelers 2010).”
Business R&D and the Interplay of R&D Subsidies and Product Market Uncertainty (2007, background): “With the availability of better micro firm-level databases and new econometric methods, scholars tend to find that crowding out effects are rejected in more recent studies (see, for instance, Almus and Czarnitzki 2003; Duguet 2004; Czarnitzki and Licht 2006; González et al. 2006; Hussinger 2007; Too”
R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semi-Parametric Two-Step Selection Models (2008, methodology): “Models with very low variation seem to be not 30See Almus and Czarnitzki (2003) or Czarnitzki and Fier (2002, 2003).”