Nature's chemical signatures in human olfaction: a foodborne perspective for future biotechnology.

By A. Dunkel, M. Steinhaus, M. Kotthoff, Bettina Nowak, D. Krautwurst, P. Schieberle, T. Hofmann. Angewandte Chemie, 2014

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Nutrition and Dietetics, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30896d3b76917ed3fde24b9222481adc34c36af2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. T. Hummel
2. K. Whitcroft
3. P. Andrews
4. A. Altundağ
5. C. Cinghi
6. H. Gudziol
7. R. Costanzo
8. M. Damm

Citations in the corpus

• Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. (2017, background): “Human gene studies have demonstrated up to 400 active OR genes, though humans are able to detect thousands of distinct odours ((56,57) but see also (58)).”