Effect of build geometry on the β-grain structure and texture in additive manufacture of Ti6Al4V by selective electron beam melting

By A. Antonysamy, J. Meyer, P. Prangnell. 2013

684 citations recorded by the source corpus.

With titanium alloys, the solidification conditions in Additive Manufacturing (AM) frequently lead to coarse columnar ?-grain structures. The effect of geometry on the variability in the grain structure and texture, seen in Tisingle bond6Alsingle bond4V alloy components produced by Selective Electron Beam Melting (SEBM), has been investigated. Reconstruction of the primary ?-phase, from ?-phase EBSD data, has confirmed that in bulk sections where in-fill ?hatching? is employed growth selection favours columnar grains aligned with an ? direction normal to the deposited powder layers; this results in a coarse ?-grain structure with a strong ? fibre texture (up 8 x random) that can oscillate between a near random distribution around the fibre axis and cube reinforcement with build height. It is proposed that this behaviour is related to the highly elongated melt pool and the raster directions alternating between two orthogonal directions every layer, which on average favours grains with cube alignment. In contrast, the outline, or ?contour?, pass produces a distinctly different grain structure and texture resulting in a skin layer on wall surfaces, where nucleation occurs off the surrounding powder and growth follows the curved surface of the melt pool. This structure becomes increasingly important in thin sections. Local heterogeneities have also been found within different section transitions, resulting from the growth of skin grain structures into thicker sections. Texture simulations have shown that the far weaker ?-texture (~ 3 x random), seen in the final product, arises from transformation on cooling occurring with a near random distribution of ?-plates across the 12 variants possible from the Burgers relationship.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3064151b68019f26c2929e56be638caa4177b344

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

  1. T. Mukherjee
  2. T. DebRoy
  3. H. Wei
  4. Amitava De
  5. Wei Zhang
  6. J. Zuback
  7. J. Elmer
  8. J. Milewski

In Materials Chemistry

  1. T. Mukherjee
  2. T. DebRoy
  3. H. Wei
  4. J. Elmer
  5. Stewart W. Williams
  6. Carolin Körner
  7. Paul A. Colegrove
  8. Maryam Sadeghilaridjani

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. T. DebRoy
  2. T. Mukherjee
  3. H. Wei
  4. Amitava De
  5. J. Elmer
  6. Wei Zhang
  7. J. Zuback
  8. Stewart W. Williams

Citations in the corpus