Taking a deeper look at pedestrians

By Jan Hendrik Hosang, Mohamed Omran, Rodrigo Benenson, Bernt Schiele. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015

352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this paper we study the use of convolutional neural networks (convnets) for the task of pedestrian detection. Despite their recent diverse successes, convnets historically underperform compared to other pedestrian detectors. We deliberately omit explicitly modelling the problem into the network (e.g. parts or occlusion modelling) and show that we can reach competitive performance without bells and whistles. In a wide range of experiments we analyse small and big convnets, their architectural choices, parameters, and the influence of different training data, including pretraining on surrogate tasks. We present the best convnet detectors on the Caltech and KITTI dataset. On Caltech our convnets reach top performance both for the Caltech1x and Caltech10x training setup. Using additional data at training time our strongest convnet model is competitive even to detectors that use additional data (optical flow) at test time.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3054aa4f655c279cc79223970f80b11c67231b0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Xiaogang Wang
  2. Bernt Schiele
  3. Jiashi Feng
  4. Xiaodan Liang
  5. Dacheng Tao
  6. Shuicheng Yan
  7. Ping Luo
  8. Alan L. Yuille

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Xiaogang Wang
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  5. Yi Yang
  6. Bernt Schiele
  7. Trevor Darrell
  8. Andrew Zisserman

Citations in the corpus