Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability
By Julian Savulescu, Iain Chalmers, J. Blunt. 1996
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Afnan
- C. Rudin
- Vincent Conitzer
- Masoud Afnan
- Abhishek Mishra
- Julian Savulescu
- Yanhe Liu
- Frank Davidoff
Citations in the corpus
- Ethical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence to Select Embryos in In Vitro Fertilization (2021, background): “failing to publish negative results [33].”
- The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001, background): “Ideally, the introduction should include a reference to a systematic review of previous similar trials or a note of the absence of such trials (73).”
- CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. (2012, background): “Ideally, it should include a reference to a systematic review of previous similar trials or a note of the absence of such trials [82].”
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010, unknown): “[82]”