Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence

By Benjamin Haibe-Kains, George Adam, Ahmed Hosny, Farnoosh Khodakarami, Levi Waldron, Bo Wang, C. McIntosh, Anna Goldenberg, Anshul B Kundaje, Casey S. Greene and 12 more. Nature, 2020

429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) hold enormous potential as it can automate complex tasks and go even beyond human performance. In their study, McKinney et al. showed the high potential of AI for breast cancer screening. However, the lack of methods’ details and algorithm code undermines its scientific value. Here, we identify obstacles hindering transparent and reproducible AI research as faced by McKinney et al., and provide solutions to these obstacles with implications for the broader field.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3025d34a8439ae92baca3f071d92a14f460ce8c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yoav Goldberg
  2. Byron C. Wallace
  3. Sarthak Jain
  4. Noah A. Smith
  5. Sarah Wiegreffe
  6. Ana Marasovic
  7. Eric P. Lehman
  8. Ala Al-Fuqaha

In Health Informatics

  1. Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates
  2. Ala Al-Fuqaha
  3. Junaid Qadir
  4. Byron C. Wallace
  5. Yoav Goldberg
  6. Louisa H.Y. Tsi
  7. Shakked Noy
  8. Whitney Zhang

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Ala Al-Fuqaha
  2. Junaid Qadir
  3. Adeel Razi
  4. Yoav Goldberg
  5. Adnan Qayyum
  6. Shakked Noy
  7. Whitney Zhang
  8. Louisa H.Y. Tsi

Citations in the corpus