Privacy by design

By S. Shapiro. Communications of the ACM, 2010

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3009cdb3aa373691a25486c595cc9bc2e07708d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Roadmap to 6G Security and Privacy (2021, background): “The additional privacy preservation mechanisms such as privacy by design [110], [111] and TEE [112], [113] can be integrating to prevent privacy leakages in blockchain based 6G services [114], [115].”
Private memoirs of a smart meter (2010, background): “Initial deployments of the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) in Ontario, Canada support meter readings at 5 to 60 minute intervals [4].”
Governance of algorithms: options and limitations (2015, background): ““Privacy by default” and “privacy by design” are technological approaches to increase privacy (Schaar, 2010; Cavoukia, 2012).”
Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy (2013, background): “Robust data protection, therefore, is achieved by explicit design of the data 86”
On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things (2013, background): “The distributed IoT approach facilitates the implementation of the privacy-by-design principles [24], as all entities can directly manage their own data.”
Data mining with big data (2016, background): “Simple data exchanges or transmissions do not resolve privacy concerns [19], [25], [42].”
Ethical by Design: Ethics Best Practices for Natural Language Processing (2017, background): “This work draws heavily on Cavoukian (2009)’s proposal but goes beyond in that we propose a process model that makes intentional and non-intentional violations harder to go unnoticed.”
Engineering Privacy by Design (2011, background): “The term “privacy by design” has been proposed by data protection policy makers [7, 42, 46].”