Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Determinants of Momentum Returns
By Narasimhan Jegadeesh, Sheridan Titman. 2002
267 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3005f14510e08f1a0ec8d22336c766f5acf0d1d6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Finance
- Wing-Keung Wong
- Hooi Hooi Lean
- Raman Uppal
- Yuliya Plyakha
- Grigory Vilkov
- W. Fong
- Victor DeMiguel
- Raymond H. Chan
Citations in the corpus
- Behavioural Finance: A Review and Synthesis (2007, unknown): “The enduring puzzle has been the issue of why acquiring firms do not earn superior returns after the takeover activity, while targets do (the evidence is well-summarised in early work by Jensen and Ruback (1983), Bradley et al.”
- International momentum strategies: a stochastic dominance approach (2005, background): “Jegadeesh and Titman (2002) also show that differences in unconditional expected returns cannot explain momentum profits.”
- Why Does an Equal-Weighted Portfolio Outperform Value- and Price-Weighted Portfolios? (2015, background): “Jegadeesh (1990) and Jegadeesh and Titman (1993, 2002) have shown that there is a relation between stock returns and momentum when looking at the extreme deciles.”
- The Illusory Nature of Momentum Profits (2004, unknown): “Jegadeesh and Titman (2002) reject the Conrad and Kaul explanation that momentum strategy profitability is due merely to cross-sectional variation in individual mean returns on the basis of small sample biases.”