Doing Template Analysis

By N. King. 2012

994 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020, neutral): “…2003; Smith & Firth, 2011), matrix analysis (e.g. Miles and Huberman 1994; Nadin and Cassell 2014) and template analysis (e.g. Brooks et al. 2015; King 2012, 2014), comprise processes and conceptualisations that have elements of each, with their own ‘best practice’ and quality criteria…”
From “It Has Stopped Our Lives” to “Spending More Time Together Has Strengthened Bonds”: The Varied Experiences of Australian Families During COVID-19 (2020, background): “This approach to data also views frequencies and other numeric data as unable to provide rich and meaningful insight into the text, unlike summative themes (King, 2012).”
The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research (2014, methodology): “Beyond these examples, Template Analysis has been used in a wide range of other settings including education, clinical psychology and sports science (King 2012 provides more detail and references).”