Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination (version 5.0)

1,933 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Are all urban green spaces a favourable habitat for pollinator communities? Bees, butterflies and hoverflies in different urban green areas (2019, methodology): “All analysis was carried out in r 3.3.2 (R Core Developmental Team, 2016) and canoco 5.0 (ter Braak & Šmilauer, 2012; Šmilauer & Lepš, 2014).”
Functional biology of parasitic plants: a review (2016, methodology): “The PCA was computed in Canoco 5 (ter Braak & Šmilauer 2012).”
Does pollen-assemblage richness reflect floristic richness? A review of recent developments and future challenges (2016, unknown): “…used as 595 a diversity measure in palaeolimnology, probably not because of its mathematical properties or 596 ecological elegance but because it was (until Canoco 5; ter Braak and Šmilauer, 2012) the only 597 diversity measure calculated in the widely-used CANOCO program (versions 2 to 4.5).”
Does a minimal intervention approach threaten the biodiversity of protected areas? A multi-taxa short-term response to intervention in temperate oak-dominated forests (2015, methodology): “The ordination analyses were performed in Canoco 5 (ter Braak and Šmilauer, 2012).”