Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment

By F. Joerin, Marius Thériault, André Musy. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2001

616 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geography, Planning and Development, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fcce98e8df8443276f2f399302f5527a934c92e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geography, Planning and Development

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation (2010, methodology): “Spatial MCDM has also become one of the most useful methods for landuse and environmental planning, as well as water and agricultural management (Davidson et al., 1994; Ahamed et al., 2000; Joerin et al., 2001; Ceballos-Silva and López-Blanco, 2003; Sicat et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007).”
GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran (2012, methodology): “…linear combination (WLC) or weighted summation/Boolean overlay methods (e.g. Carver 1991), the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (e.g. Banai 1993), ordered weighted average (OWA) (Yager 1988), the ideal/reference point methods (e.g. Eastman 1997) and the outranking methods (e.g. Joerin et al. 2001).”
Multi-attribute Decision Analysis in GIS: Weighted Linear Combination and Ordered Weighted Averaging (2009, methodology): “Concordance-discordance analyses are methods in which each pair of alternatives, represented as raster pixels or polygons, is analysed for the degree to which one outranks the other in the specified criteria [3, 18, 27, 29, 36].”
GIS-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis (2011, methodology): “Well-known methods of this type include: 1 ELECTRE: A family of outranking methods (ELECTRE I, II, III, IV and TRI) that have evolved along with the European school of MCDA (Bouyssou et al. 2006; Joerin et al. 2001).”
Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping (2014, background): “…types of conflicts have been explored or examined in separate studies; for example, the visual blight of wind turbines (van der Horst & Toke, 2010), noise from road traffic (Joerin et al., 2001), and conflicts associated with land clearance for new residential developments (Young et al., 2005).”
A GIS-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Weights (2009, methodology): “As GIS-based MCDM becomes one of the most useful methods for spatial planning and management (Joerin et al., 2001; Karnatak, et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2009 ), the request for tools supporting collaborative decisions has increased over the last decade.”
Extinction risk in cloud forest fragments under climate change and habitat loss (2013, background): “Other alternatives that could be interesting to test are combining models for decision support (Jankowski & Richard, 1994; Malczewski, 1996; Joerin et al., 2001; Geneletti, 2004) or models of coupled dynamic bioclimatic models with stochastic population models (Keith et al.”