Politeness, Humor and Gender in the Workplace: Negotiating Norms and Identifying Contestation

By Janet Holmes, S. Schnurr. 2005

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fc16eb48262cf19cb1d0eb17d7f1767bfe86078

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Michael Haugh

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Michael Haugh

In Social Psychology

1. Michael Haugh

Citations in the corpus

• The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative (2007, background): “In addition, quantitative analyses of corpus or elicited data seems to hold no place in the discursive approach (Holmes and Schnurr 2005: 144; Terkourafi 2005a; Usami 2002), nor do insights from experimental approaches (Holtgraves 2005a: 89).”
• Politeness and impoliteness (2011, unknown): “…(e.g. the failure to redress or redress adequately a FTA);  treating, explicitly or otherwise, impoliteness as the opposite of politeness, yet only developing concepts for explaining politeness (e.g. Blum-Kulka [1992] 2005 develops cultural scripts to explain politeness but not impoliteness).”