Laboratory evidence on the effectiveness of corporate leniency programs

By Jeroen Hinloopen, A. Soetevent. 2008

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fa4c0dc79b9bf27e0d5da4b9b565fb225d06e1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Holger A. Rau
2. Mark Armstrong
3. Georg Clemens

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Holger A. Rau
2. Mark Armstrong
3. Steffen Huck
4. Georg Clemens
5. Andrei Hagiu
6. Lars A. Stole
7. Julian Wright
8. Tobias Wenzel

In Marketing

1. Holger A. Rau
2. Mark Armstrong
3. Georg Clemens
4. Andrei Hagiu
5. Lars A. Stole
6. Julian Wright
7. Tobias Wenzel
8. Paul Belleflamme

Citations in the corpus

• On the Design of Leniency Programs (2013, unknown): “…prosecution and shows that some bluff (namely, launching an indepth investigation even when it has little chance of succeeding without coop- 4 Hinloopen and Soetevent (2008) run an experiment, based on a repeated version of the setting first introduced by Apesteguia, Dufwenberg, and Selten…”
• Do leniency policies facilitate collusion? Experimental evidence (2015, methodology): “As opposed to Apesteguia et al. (2007) and Hinloopen and Soetevent (2008), Bigoni et al. (2012) nd that leniency increases prices.”
• Behavioral Economics as Applied to Firms: A Primer (2010, background): “21 For instance, see Dufwenberg and Gneezy (2000), Baye and Morgan (2004) and Hinloopen and Soetevent (2008).”