Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: two meta-analyses (2017, background): “Surveillance cue effects have been reported as appearing in men but not women (Rigdon et al., 2009), or among an ingroup but not an outgroup (Mifune et al., 2010); they have been described as having the opposite effect on participants high in prevention-focused self-regulation than they do on those…”
Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: a field experiment (2011, methodology): “…Ishii, Watabe, and Kitayama (2009), who showed that a face-like arrangement of three dots sufficed to produce the effect in the Dictator Game, and Mifune, Hashimoto, and Yamagishi (2010), who used stimuli of the same kind as Haley and Fessler (2005) and showed that the eyes effect in the…”
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. (2014, background): “…CA 0.20 [ 0.12, 0.52] M DG C $ OS 2 Mifune & Yamagishi (2012) 93 JP 0.34 [0.21, 0.47] M PD C $ OS 2 Sample b 93 JP 0.05 [ 0.04, 0.15] M PD U $ OS 2 Mifune et al. (2010) 45 .63 JP 0.61 [ 0.02, 1.24] M DG C $ OS 2 Study 2a 142 .54 JP 0.41 [0.08, 0.74] M DG C $ OS 2 Sample 2ba 142 .54 JP 0.10 […”