Defending equality of outcome

By Anne Phillips. 2004

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Welfare Regimes and Education Regimes: Equality of Opportunity and Expenditure in the EU (and US) (2013, background): “4 Phillips (2004) argues convincingly that equality of outcome has to be taken as a key measure of equality of opportunity.”
Women, careers, and work-life preferences (2006, background): “However, many feminist scholars insist that there are no ‘natural’ differences between men and women, and that sex discrimination (direct and structural) is the primary reason for differences between men and women in labour market outcomes (see, for example, Bryson, 1992; Phillips, 2004).”
Resources versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory (2007, background): “See for similar critiques Altman (2001, pp. 254–5), Anderson (1999, p. 288), Phillips (2004) and Young (2001).”
Individual Fairness in Hindsight (2018, background): “ya Sen eloquently argued that the heart of the issue rests on clarifying the “equality of what?” problem (Sen 2013). Equality can be desired with respect to opportunity (Hardt et al. 2016), outcomes (Phillips 2004), treatment (Dwork et al. 2012), or even mistreatment (Zafar et al. 2017). In this pap”
Gender Equality and Fertility: Which Equality Matters? (2013, unknown): “Such an approach incorporates the notion of gender equity suggested by Fraser (1994) and McDonald (2000a, b), and connects it to recent debates on ‘‘which equalities matter’’ for gender equality (Phillips 1999, 2004, 2006).”