A Rule For Updating Ambiguous Beliefs

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Vector Expected Utility and Attitudes Toward Variation (2008, background): “12Indeed, this condition may be used to characterize Bayesian updating for EU preferences, as well as prior-by-prior Bayesian updating for MEU preferences: see Pires [42].”
Updating Ambiguity Averse Preferences (2009, background): “Sarin and Wakker [42], Pires [40], Siniscalchi [50], Wang [57] and Epstein and Schneider [11] formally characterize this update rule using preference axioms in various settings.”
Updating Choquet Beliefs (2007, methodology): “…rule arises from axioms on the preferences both unconditional and conditional: a nonexhaustive list of examples includes Epstein and Schneider (2003), Gilboa and Schmeidler (1993), Hanany and Klibanoff (2006), Pires (2002), Siniscalchi (2006), Sarin and Wakker (1998), Walley (1991) and Wang (2003).”
Revealed Ambiguity and Its Consequences: Updating (2008, background): “They are inspired by a result of Pires (2002), who shows that when the primitive preference relations A are 1-MEU, generalized Bayesian updating is characterized by (a condition equivalent to) f A (∼A)x⇐⇒ f Ax (∼)x (11) for all f ∈ F and x ∈ X. Statement (iii) in the proposition departs from…”