Factor Analysis with Ordinal Indicators: A Monte Carlo Study Comparing DWLS and ULS Estimation
By C. G. Forero, Albert Maydeu-Olivares, David Gallardo-Pujol. 2009
646 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Food Science, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f5fc241ed4ea4ef4c62d3f14aef5c3f1206ccd6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Dexin Shi
- C. Distefano
- Albert Maydeu-Olivares
- Yanyun Yang
- Heather L. McDaniel
- Zhehan Jiang
- Grant B. Morgan
- E. Koğar
In Food Science
- C. Distefano
- Dexin Shi
- Grant B. Morgan
- E. Koğar
- Hakan Koğar
- Victoria Savalei
- Yves Rosseel
- Patricia E. Brosseau‐Liard
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Dexin Shi
- Albert Maydeu-Olivares
- Alexander Robitzsch
- Yves Rosseel
- C. Distefano
- Yanyun Yang
- Grant B. Morgan
- Heather L. McDaniel
Citations in the corpus
- RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods (2018, result): “Simulation studies have found that ULS results in higher nonconvergence rates than does DWLS (Forero, Maydeu-Olivares, & GallardoPujol, 2009), but that it provides slightly more accurate parameter estimates and standard errors than DWLS (Forero et al., 2009; C. H. Li, 2014; Yang-Wallentin, Jöreskog,”
- Examining Chi-Square Test Statistics Under Conditions of Large Model Size and Ordinal Data (2018, methodology): “ULSMV outperformed WLSMV, yielding better Type I error levels and less bias observed in standard errors, particularly if sample sizes were smaller, as ULS methods are not as sensitive as WLS-based methods to nonconvergence (Forero et al., 2009; Rhemtulla, Brosseau-Liard, & Savalei, 2012; Savalei & R”
- Testing Measurement Invariance in Longitudinal Data with Ordered-Categorical Measures (2016, positive): “…these methods have satisfactory performance; they are all prone to nonconvergence, improper solutions, large standard errors, biased estimates of factor loadings and thresholds, and problematic goodness-of-fit tests (Forero & Maydeu-Olivares, 2009; Forero et al., 2009; Savalei & Rhemtulla, 2013).”
- Comparison of Different Estimation Methods for Categorical and Ordinal Data in Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2015, methodology): “Forero et al. (2009) compared ULS and DWLS methods in their simulation study.”
- Are Fit Indices Biased in Favor of Bi-Factor Models in Cognitive Ability Research?: A Comparison of Fit in Correlated Factors, Higher-Order, and Bi-Factor Models via Monte Carlo Simulations (2015, background): “Models that did not converge were excluded from the analysis given that they do not provide useful information [47].”