Conserving plant genetic diversity for dependent animal communities

By G. Wimp, W. Young, S. A. Woolbright, G. Martinsen, P. Keim, T. Whitham. 2004

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f399c3d17d9a7a51ff777e6382893a45fce476c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Marc T. J. Johnson
2. A. Agrawal
3. A. Hughes
4. Aapo Kahilainen
5. J. Kotiaho
6. Mikael Puurtinen
7. M. Vellend
8. C. Gehring

In Genetics

1. Marc T. J. Johnson
2. A. Agrawal
3. A. Hughes
4. Aapo Kahilainen
5. J. Kotiaho
6. Mikael Puurtinen
7. John F. Tooker
8. B. Inouye

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Marc T. J. Johnson
2. C. Gehring
3. A. Hughes
4. J. Kotiaho
5. Aapo Kahilainen
6. Mikael Puurtinen
7. A. Agrawal
8. B. Inouye

Citations in the corpus

• Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations (2014, background): “However, it needs to be noted that studies included in that analysis often considered species diversity across different trophic levels and functional groups, and thereforemay largely reflect processes related to trophic cascades (e.g.Wimp et al., 2004, Crawford and Rudgers, 2013).”
• Genotypically diverse cultivar mixtures for insect pest management and increased crop yields (2012, background): “Similar to effects of plant species diversity, genotypic diversity plays an important role in structuring insect communities and driving ecological interactions at multiple trophic levels (Table 1, Fig. 1; Peacock & Herrick 2000; Wimp et al. 2004; Crutsinger et al. 2006; Johnson, Lajeunesse & Agrawa”
• Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. (2008, background): “For example, plant (cottonwood, Populus sp.) population genetic diversity was significantly correlated with arthropod species diversity, explaining nearly 60% of the variation among natural stands (Wimp et al. 2004).”
• PLANT GENOTYPE AND ENVIRONMENT INTERACT TO SHAPE A DIVERSE ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY ON EVENING PRIMROSE (OENOTHERA BIENNIS) (2005, background): “Therefore, reductions in the genetic diversity within populations are likely to have immediate community-level consequences for many species (Bangert et al. 2004, Wimp et al. 2004).”
• Deadly combination of genes and drought: increased mortality of herbivore‐resistant trees in a foundation species (2009, background): “Recent studies demonstrate that genetically-based plant traits can affect dependent communities (Wimp et al., 2004; Johnson & Agrawal, 2005; Crutsinger et al., 2006), and ecosystem processes (Treseder & Vitousek, 2001; Schweitzer et al., 2004, 2005; Crutsinger et al., 2006; Leroy et al., 2007).”
• Within-species variation in foliar chemistry influences leaf-litter decomposition in a Utah river (2007, background): “Other research in the adjacent riparian forest using the same common-garden trees showed that terrestrial arthropods have high fidelity to trees of one parental or hybrid type over others (Wimp et al. 2004, 2005, Bangert et al. 2005).”
• A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems (2006, unknown): “In support of this hypothesis, studies of natural populations showed that genetic variation in poplars accounted for nearly 60% of the variation in an arthropod community of 207 specie”