The Effects of Abiotic and Biotic Factors in Determining Larval Fish Growth Rates: A Comparison Across Species and Reservoirs
By R. Claramunt, D. Wahl. 2000
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f2fa48a227e24aa34dd430d91a3f8c72a6f9d29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Chemistry
In Global and Planetary Change
- Ted R. Sommer
- M. Nobriga
- Julie A. Adams
- T. Galarowicz
- D. Wahl
- F. Feyrer
- Francine H. Mejia
- Kevin Fleming
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Ted R. Sommer
- M. Nobriga
- Julie A. Adams
- T. Galarowicz
- D. Wahl
- F. Feyrer
- Francine H. Mejia
- Kevin Fleming
Citations in the corpus
- Multidecadal trends for three declining fish species: habitat patterns and mechanisms in the San Francisco Estuary, California, USA (2007, background): “fish–habitat relationships and long-term trends in habitat suitability is critical because abiotic habitat components can affect the population dynamics of fishes in most habitat types (e.g., Cardinale and Arrhenius 2000; Claramunt and Wahl 2000; Rose 2000).”
- Effects of Temperature on the Early Development, Growth, and Survival of Shortnose Sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, and Atlantic Sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrhynchus, Yolk-Sac Larvae (2004, unknown): “During these vulnerable stages, fishes may be adversely affected by environmental factors that influence survival and subsequent year-class strength (Houde 1994, Claramunt & Wahl 2000 ).”
- The influence of prey availability on ontogenetic diet shifts of a juvenile piscivore (2006, methodology): “1994; Claramunt and Wahl 2000), benthic invertebrates (Garvey and Stein 1998; Kline 2000), and fish (Claramunt and Wahl 2000), and (ii) they are below and above the inflection point of type II functional response curves for walleye offered each prey type separately (Galarowicz and Wahl 2005).”