Rethinking ‘validity’ and ‘trustworthiness’ in qualitative inquiry: how might we judge the quality of qualitative research in sport and exercise sciences?

By Shaunna M. Burke. 2016

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology (2017, methodology): “As Burke (2016) noted when outlining qualitative research in sport and exercise, ‘Tracy is now on the verge of becoming the new “benchmark” for judging all qualitative research within this sub discipline’ (p. 333).”
Qualitative research in six sport and exercise psychology journals between 2010 and 2017: An updated and expanded review of trends and interpretations (2019, methodology): “on epistemology, methods, study goals and context (Burke, 2016; Sparkes & Smith, 2009).”
Thinking through and designing qualitative research studies: a focused mapping review of 30 years of qualitative research in sport psychology (2019, background): “We refer the reader to Corbin and Strauss (2008), Burke (2016), Sparkes and Smith (2014), and Smith and McGannon (2018) for further discussion of strategies that researchers can take to enhance the quality of qualitative research.”