Financialization, income distribution and the crisis

By Engelbert Stockhammer. 2013

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The paper argues that the process of financialization has profoundly changed how capitalist economies operate. The financial sector has grown relative to the real economy and become more fragile. Non-financial businesses have adopted shareholder value orientation, which had negative effects on investment. Working class households became squeezed because of rising inequality and have become more indebted, in particular in countries with real estate bubbles. Financial globalization has given rise to growing international imbalances, which have allowed two growth models to emerge: a debt-led consumption growth model and an export-led growth model. Both should be understood as reactions to the lack of effective demand due to the polarization of income distribution. The resulting finance-dominated accumulation regime is characterized by slow and fragile growth. The crisis is best understood as the outcome of the interaction of financialization and changes in income distribution.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f033244c2982f0a399bf2f43d42d35c7946b00f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Rafael Wildauer
  2. Engelbert Stockhammer
  3. Özlem Onaran
  4. Till van Treeck
  5. Eckhard Hein
  6. Lucas Grafl
  7. P. Tridico
  8. Firat Demir

In Finance

  1. Rafael Wildauer
  2. Engelbert Stockhammer
  3. Özlem Onaran
  4. Till van Treeck
  5. Firat Demir
  6. Eckhard Hein
  7. Lucas Grafl
  8. Thomas Dallery

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Rafael Wildauer
  2. Engelbert Stockhammer
  3. Özlem Onaran
  4. P. Tridico

Citations in the corpus