MULTOPS: A Data-Structure for Bandwidth Attack Detection
By Thomer M. Gil, Massimiliano Poletto. USENIX Security Symposium, 2001
504 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2edb1f13022b7b44d405c8f4fd97f7babbb07d1a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- David Warren Tipper
- James B. D. Joshi
- Saman Taghavi Zargar
- Graham Cormode
- S. Muthu Muthukrishnan
- Kang G. Shin
- Haining Wang
- Danlu Zhang
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Graham Cormode
- S. Muthu Muthukrishnan
- David Warren Tipper
- James B. D. Joshi
- Saman Taghavi Zargar
- Jennifer Rexford
- Kang G. Shin
- Haining Wang
In Hardware and Architecture
- N. Feamster
- Jennifer Rexford
- Kang G. Shin
- David Warren Tipper
- Matthias Jacob
- S. Muthu Muthukrishnan
- James B. D. Joshi
- Peter L. Reiher
Citations in the corpus
- A novel approach to detection of intrusions in computer networks via adaptive sequential and batch-sequential change-point detection methods (2006, background): “In fact, DOS flooding attacks remain the subject of intensive research, as can be seen in [11], [13], [19], [20], [22], and [37].”
- Sonata: query-driven streaming network telemetry (2018, methodology): “Autofocus [13], ProgME [57], and DREAM [29], SCREAM [30], MULTOPS [15], and HHH [23] all iteratively zoom in on traffic of interest.”
- Change-point monitoring for the detection of DoS attacks (2004, methodology): “In the design of MULTOPS [17], a tree of nodes is built to keep packet-rate statistics for subnets at different aggregation levels.”
- Botz-4-sale: surviving organized DDoS attacks that mimic flash crowds (2005, methodology): “Gil et al [22] detect a bandwidth flood attack against a Web server by comparing the n umber of packets from client to server with those from server to cli ent.”
- Attacking DDoS at the source (2002, methodology): “MULTOPS [9] proposes a heuristic and a data-structure that network devices can use to detect DDoS attacks.”
- Hop-count filtering: an effective defense against spoofed DDoS traffic (2003, background): “Therefore, victim-based .ltering, which detects and discards spoofed traf.c without any router support, is essential to protecting victims against DDoS attacks.”
- DDoS attacks and defense mechanisms: classification and state-of-the-art (2004, background): “Examples of these mechanisms are proposed in [54,101,53].”
- Finding Hierarchical Heavy Hitters in Data Streams (2003, background): “The need for maintaining multilevel heavy hitters on variablelength IP address prefixes was articulated in [10, 18].”
- A taxonomy of DDoS attack and DDoS defense mechanisms (2004, methodology): “[32, 23, 52, 51] provide examples of source-network defenses.”
- A Survey of Defense Mechanisms Against Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Flooding Attacks (2013, methodology): “One major drawback of MULTOPS is that it uses a dynamic tree structure for monitoring packet rates for each IP address which makes it a vulnerable target of a memory exhaustion attack [60].”