Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality
By A. Koelmans, Nur Hazimah Mohamed Nor, E. Hermsen, M. Kooi, S. Mintenig, J. De France. Water Research, 2019
1,987 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Microplastics have recently been detected in drinking water as well as in drinking water sources. This presence has triggered discussions on possible implications for human health. However, there have been questions regarding the quality of these occurrence studies since there are no standard sampling, extraction and identification methods for microplastics. Accordingly, we assessed the quality of fifty studies researching microplastics in drinking water and in its major freshwater sources. This includes an assessment of microplastic occurrence data from river and lake water, groundwater, tap water and bottled drinking water. Studies of occurrence in wastewater were also reviewed. We review and propose best practices to sample, extract and detect microplastics and provide a quantitative quality assessment of studies reporting microplastic concentrations. Further, we summarize the findings related to microplastic concentrations, polymer types and particle shapes. Microplastics are frequently present in freshwaters and drinking water, and number concentrations spanned ten orders of magnitude (1 × 10−2 to 108 #/m3) across individual samples and water types. However, only four out of 50 studies received positive scores for all proposed quality criteria, implying there is a significant need to improve quality assurance of microplastic sampling and analysis in water samples. The order in globally detected polymers in these studies is PE ≈ PP > PS > PVC > PET, which probably reflects the global plastic demand and a higher tendency for PVC and PET to settle as a result of their higher densities. Fragments, fibres, film, foam and pellets were the most frequently reported shapes. We conclude that more high quality data is needed on the occurrence of microplastics in drinking water, to better understand potential exposure and to inform human health risk assessments.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ebdbb50e1c693b019f0263b3a7f6263c41625e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- W. Courtene-Jones
- Richard C. Thompson
- Sabine Pahl
- Julien Boucher
- Karen Raubenheimer
- A. Koelmans
- L. Hoogenboom
In Pollution
- W. Courtene-Jones
- Richard C. Thompson
- Sabine Pahl
- Julien Boucher
- Karen Raubenheimer
- A. Koelmans
- A. Lusher
- L. Hoogenboom
Citations in the corpus
- Toxicity of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Mammalian Systems (2020, background): “Humans could accumulate MPs/NPs from different food sources [53,54] as well as drinking water [55,56].”
- Contributions of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in microplastic pollution research: A review (2020, background): “Microplastic (MP) contamination in water (both marine and fresh water) (Gago et al., 2016; Koelmans et al., 2019), sediment (Cauwenberghe et al., 2015; Xu, Liu, et al., 2019), air (Zhang et al., 2020), salt (Peixoto et al., 2019), biota (Rezania et al., 2018; O’Connor et al., 2020; Markic et al.,…”
- Twenty years of microplastic pollution research—what have we learned? (2024, background): “The relationship between microplastic type and abundance with ingestion is multifaceted ( 24 , 59 , 60 ).”