Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectations for large time
By M. Donsker, S. Varadhan. 1975
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Zhe Gan
- Dacheng Tao
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Chunyuan Li
- Trevor Darrell
- Jiaming Song
Citations in the corpus
- Mutual Information Neural Estimation (2018, methodology): “A key technical ingredient of MINE are dual representations of the KL-divergence.”
- Formal Limitations on the Measurement of Mutual Information (2018, background): “UES WITH THE DONSKER-VARADHAN LOWER BOUND The Donsker-Varadhan (DV) lower bound on KL divergence is stated below. For completeness, a simple proof is given in the supplementary material. Theorem 2.1 (Donsker and Varadhan, 1983). Let p Xand q Xbe distributions over Xwith finite KL divergence. Then for”
- Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution Matching (2019, methodology): “However, in contrast to the form used in Equation 4 or 5, we use the Donsker-Varadhan representation (Donsker & Varadhan, 1983) given by, s,a ) ] − E ( s,a ) ∼ d π [ x ( s, a )] .”
- Obfuscation via Information Density Estimation (2019, methodology): “TIDE is based on a variational representation of KL divergence1 known as the Donsker-Varadhan (DV) representation (Donsker and Varadhan, 1983), given by DKL(PS,X‖PSPX) = sup g:S×X→R {EPS,X [g(S,X)]− logEPSPX [eg(S,X)]}.”
- Multi-label Contrastive Predictive Coding (2020, methodology): “CPC would tend to underestimate the density ratio (since it is capped at m) and generally requires O(e ) samples to achieve low bias; MINE [3] (based on the Donsker-Varadhan inequality [14]) is a biased estimator and requires O(e ) samples to achieve low variance [44, 43].”
- Factorizing Knowledge in Neural Networks (2022, methodology): “We substitute q(y|x) into Equation 9 and derive an unnormalized lower bound on MI, which we refer to as IUBA for the Barber and Agakov bound [1] and IDA Donsker & Varadhan bound [6].”
- A Course on Large Deviations With an Introduction to Gibbs Measures (2015, background): “A uniformity condition can also be formulated for Polish spaces ([25, 33], Section 6.”
- User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes bounds (2021, background): “Apply Fubini: ESEθ∼π [ eλ[r(θ)−R(θ)] ] ≤ eλ 2C2 8n and then Donsker and Varadhan’s variational formula (Lemma 2.2): ES [ esupρ∈P(Θ) λEθ∼ρ[r(θ)−R(θ)]−KL(ρ‖π) ] ≤ eλ 2C2 8n .”
- On large deviations of coupled diffusions with time scale separation (2013, background): “tup of the averaging principle where C(u,x) = 0. The LDP for the empirical measures of continuous-time Markov processes, such as in Corollary 2.3, is a well explored subject, see Donsker and Varadhan [13, 14], Deuschel and Stroock [12]. The canonical form of the large deviation rate function is supf”
- Bridging the Gap Between $f$-GANs and Wasserstein GANs (2019, background): “First, we show that Proposition 2 directly implies the DonskerVaradhan inequality (Donsker and Varadhan, 1975).”
- Smooth Ambiguity Aversion toward Small Risks and Continuous-Time Recursive Utility (2013, background): “A variational identity of Donsker and Varadhan (1975) (which is also a corollary of Proposition 8 of Section 3.”
- Lifelong Learning with Non-i.i.d. Tasks (2015, unknown): “By applying Donsker-Varadhan’s variational formula [15] one obtains that: er(Q)− ẽr(Q) ≤ 1 λ ( KL(Q||P) + logEA∼P expλ ( er(A)− 1 n− 1 n ∑”
- Generalized Energy Based Models (2020, background): “When the Kullback-Leibler divergence between P and G is well defined, (5) corresponds to the Donsker-Varadhan (DV) lower bound on the KL (Donsker and Varadhan, 1975), meaning that KL(P||G)≥LP,G(E) for allE, with equality only whenE is the negative log-density ratio of P w.”