DISCOVERY OF A TRANSITING PLANET AND EIGHT ECLIPSING BINARIES IN HATNet FIELD G205

68 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A SYSTEMATIC SEARCH FOR TRANSITING PLANETS IN THE K2 DATA (2015, background): “For example, Latham et al. (2009) reported eight eclipsing binaries and one transiting planet among the sample of transit candidates in one field of the Hungarian Automated Telescope Network transit search.”
THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER AND THE OCCURRENCE OF PLANETS (2013, result): “This conclusion differs significantly from the experience of all previous transit surveys, where the rates were typically up to an order of magnitude larger (e.g., ∼80% for the HATNet survey; Latham et al. 2009).”
ON THE LOW FALSE POSITIVE PROBABILITIES OF KEPLER PLANET CANDIDATES (2011, background): “This results in an FPP of 0.77 for a hot Jupiter-like transit signal for a HAT-like ground-based search, according well with Latham et al. (2009), who describe the results of follow-up efforts of a sample of transit candidates, eight of which turned out to be blended binaries and one to be a planet.”
HOT STARS WITH HOT JUPITERS HAVE HIGH OBLIQUITIES (2010, background): “Latham et al. (2009) provided a complete inventory of transit candidates and followup observations, which we take to be representative.”
LOW FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER CANDIDATES ESTIMATED FROM A COMBINATION OF SPITZER AND FOLLOW-UP OBSERVATIONS (2015, background): “It has been shown that from 80 to 90% of the candidates are false-positives for the most successful ground-based exoplanet surveys (e.g., Latham et al. 2009).”