The origins of face perception: specific versus non‐specific mechanisms

By F. Simion, V. M. Cassia, C. Turati, E. Valenza. 2001

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e97c66dd63ca313246bc58289e168e481531a17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Daphne Maurer
2. Mark H. Johnson
3. Bruno Rossion
4. Leonhard Schilbach
5. Roxane J. Itier
6. Magali Batty
7. Sabina Pauen
8. Gergely Csibra

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Mark H. Johnson
2. Antonio Torralba
3. Luc Van Gool
4. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
5. Jitendra Malik
6. Trevor Darrell
7. Alan L. Yuille
8. Dacheng Tao

Citations in the corpus

• Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About (2006, background): “More recent work [ 73 ] suggests that newborns simply preferBtop-heaviness[ [Fig. 15(b)].”
• Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing (2002, background): “…et al 1991; Mondloch et al 1999; Valenza et al 1996)öa result which suggests that even newborns are able to detect the first-order relational features of the face (two eyes above a nose, and a mouth below the noseöDiamond and Carey 1986; but see Simion et al 2001 for an alternative explanation).”
• Subcortical face processing (2005, background): “Havert, unpublished observations) have conducted a preliminary experiment in which adults viewed some of the stimuli used in newborn studie”