Why do business service firms cluster? Small consultancies, clustering and decentralization in London and southern England
By D. Keeble, Lilach Nachum. 2002
257 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e8987bbc6b70e25464bf9421971c8ba60927bb2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- P. Sunley
- Arne Isaksen
- Ron Martin
- Michaela Trippl
- Ron A. Boschma
- David Doloreux
- S. Parto
- P. Benneworth
In Strategy and Management
- P. Sunley
- Ron Martin
- S. Parto
- David Doloreux
- P. Benneworth
- Arne Isaksen
- David Newlands
- Michaela Trippl
In Urban Studies
- S. Parto
- P. Benneworth
- P. Sunley
- Ron Martin
- Arne Isaksen
- David Doloreux
- David Newlands
- Robert Huggins
Citations in the corpus
- Competition and Cooperation in Industrial Clusters: The Implications for Public Policy (2003, background): “This is the hypothesis advanced by Keeble and Nachum (2001) in their comparison of the economic performance of business service firms in a central London cluster with those in dispersed locations in East Anglia and south-west England.”
- In what sense ‘regional development?’: entrepreneurship, underdevelopment and strong tradition in the periphery (2004, background): “…tend to be characterized in negative ways in regional development analyses – lifestyle, dead-end, hobby, satisficing (Coe and Townsend 1998, Keeble and Nachum 2002), hiding that many firms did not use ‘traditional’ technologies, but high technology fields such as electronic controls,…”
- Micro-geographies of creative industries clusters in Europe: From hot spots to assemblages (2015, unknown): “Keeble & Nachum (2002) and Cuadrado-Roura (2013) have noted that the clustering of KIBS, particularly in large cities, is determined by specific factors such as: access to skilled staff; access to localized and relatively immobile tacit knowledge; access to knowledge spillovers; the presence of…”
- Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues (2005, background): “Examples include the Garment District in New York [72], the software industry in Oslo [49], the electronic cluster in Toronto [73], the media industry in Montreal [74], and the service industry in London [75].”
- Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? (2003, background): “Why have some economic geographers themselves started to use cluster terminology in preference to their own (for example, Pinch and Henry, 1999; May, Mason and Pinch, 2001; Scott, 2001; Keeble and Wilkinson, 2000; Keeble and Nachum, 2002)?”
- Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Urban Industrial Development (2007, background): “Demand side factors are therefore important in explaining the concentration of the software industry and organisational consultancies in the Oslo region [cf. Keeble and Nachum, 2002]; KIBS firms grow and stay near their largest market.”