Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here?
By Laure Gallien, T. Münkemüller, Cécile H. Albert, Isabelle Boulangeat, Wilfried Thuiller. 2010
393 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e85f466d7dd75678cfa23469b4c05cdcddb3767
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Antoine Guisan
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Jane Elith
- Miguel B. Araújo
- A. Townsend Peterson
- Jens‐Christian Svenning
- N. E. Zimmermann
- Miska Luoto
In Ecology
- Jane Elith
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Antoine Guisan
- D. Richardson
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Jens‐Christian Svenning
- Miska Luoto
- N. E. Zimmermann
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Antoine Guisan
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Jane Elith
- Miguel B. Araújo
- D. Richardson
- N. E. Zimmermann
- Jens‐Christian Svenning
- A. Townsend Peterson
Citations in the corpus
- Climatic niche shifts between species' native and naturalized ranges raise concern for ecological forecasts during invasions and climate change (2014, background): “In light of our results, combining both native and naturalized ranges to improve predictions of the invasive range seems sensible (Broennimann & Guisan, 2008; Gallien et al., 2010).”
- Biological Flora of the British Isles: Ambrosia artemisiifolia (2015, background): “However, there is uncertainty in predicting the spread of any invasive species (Gallien et al. 2010).”
- Extinction risk of North American seed plants elevated by climate and land‐use change (2017, methodology): “Models were calibrated for the baseline period using a 80% random sample of initial data and evaluated for predictive accuracy against the remaining 20% of data using true skill statistics (TSS) (Allouche, Tsoar & Kadmon 2006; Marmion et al. 2009).”
- Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity (2012, background): “However, a new generation of models is emerging that focuses on more realistic biological hypotheses and meets some of the challenges posed by each limitation (e.g. Thuiller et al. 2008; Brook et al. 2009; Gallien et al. 2010).”
- Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management (2016, background): “Current research is focusing on improved algorithms and applications (135, 136), as well as incorporating the effects of species interactions (137).”
- Predicting distributions of invasive species (2013, methodology): “…for this chapter, methods for exploring adaptive genetic change and predicting traits likely to be under selection pressure are relevant to invasive species and are an important topic for understanding the ecology and biogeography of invasive species (Ackerly, 2003; Alexander & Edwards, 2010).”
- The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling (2012, methodology): “(c) Hybridizing SDMs with dynamic models In recent years there have been major advances to make SDMs more mechanistic and realistic by incorporating elements of process-based models (Thuiller et al., 2008; Gallien et al., 2010).”
- Conservation biogeography – foundations, concepts and challenges (2010, background): “…may be grouped into the following broad themes (with some belonging in more than one category): species distribution modelling (Franklin, 2010; Gallien et al., 2010; Scoble & Lowe, 2010); data requirements (Devictor et al., 2010; Robertson et al., 2010); approaches for assigning conservation…”
- Invasive species distribution models – how violating the equilibrium assumption can create new insights (2012, background): “In the context of invasion ecology it is important to specify that there are (at least) three possible views of an invasive species’ niche (Gallien et al., 2010).”