Understanding how image quality affects deep neural networks

By Samuel F. Dodge, Lina Karam. 2016

815 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Image quality is an important practical challenge that is often overlooked in the design of machine vision systems. Commonly, machine vision systems are trained and tested on high quality image datasets, yet in practical applications the input images can not be assumed to be of high quality. Recently, deep neural networks have obtained state-of-the-art performance on many machine vision tasks. In this paper we provide an evaluation of 4 state-of-the-art deep neural network models for image classification under quality distortions. We consider five types of quality distortions: blur, noise, contrast, JPEG, and JPEG2000 compression. We show that the existing networks are susceptible to these quality distortions, particularly to blur and noise. These results enable future work in developing deep neural networks that are more invariant to quality distortions.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Media Technology, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Trevor Darrell
  5. Jitendra Malik
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Bernt Schiele

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

  1. Matthias Bethge
  2. Wieland Brendel
  3. Oliver Bringmann
  4. Samuel F. Dodge
  5. Lina Karam
  6. Robert Geirhos
  7. Gregory Shakhnarovich
  8. Ayan Chakrabarti

In Media Technology

  1. Samuel F. Dodge
  2. Lina Karam
  3. Gregory Shakhnarovich
  4. Matthias Bethge
  5. Igor Vasiljevic
  6. Oliver Bringmann
  7. Luc Van Gool
  8. Wieland Brendel

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Wieland Brendel
  2. Matthias Bethge
  3. Jonas Rauber
  4. Oliver Bringmann
  5. Evgenia Rusak
  6. Robert Geirhos
  7. Samuel F. Dodge
  8. Lina Karam

Citations in the corpus