Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France

By Philippe Martin, Thierry Mayer, F. Mayneris. 2011

387 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e51b1bc8be6b7e13b1c7fa21957dab9cd0ce51c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Multilevel Approaches and the Firm‐Agglomeration Ambiguity in Economic Growth Studies (2012, neutral): “The theories that underlie agglomeration economies are microeconomic in nature (Martin et al. 2011).”
Local export spillovers in France (2010, neutral): “estimation procedure on French data, see Martin et al. (2008) ).”
Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities (2016, neutral): “A recent study by Wang (2013) also uses a panel of Chinese cities and finds, using a difference-in-difference approach similar to ours, positive effects of SEZ on foreign direct investments (FDI), exports, and the output of foreign enterprises. The effects on other outcome variables (which do not co”
The role of spatial agglomeration in a structural model of innovation, productivity and export: a firm-level analysis (2011, neutral): “ Martin et al. (2008) , using French individual firm data from 1996 to 2004, find no significant effect of spatial agglomeration on firm productivity.”
Lock-in or lock-out ? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience (2014, background): “These two structural properties do not challenge cluster 16 policies as a whole nor conclude on the relevance of laissez-faire (Martin et al, 2011).”
Productivity growth in the Old and New Europe: the role of agglomeration externalities (2013, neutral): “4An inverted-U shape of productivity gains from agglomeration is found in the study for China by Au and Henderson (2006) and for France by Martin et al. (2011).”
The Empirics of Agglomeration Economies (2014, neutral): “A non-significant estimate for %, as obtained for instance by Martin et al. (2011) for France, does not imply that there is no urbanisation effect, but rather means that the effects of specialisation and total employment, which are usually both positive, compensate.11 Finally, note that one…”