Correlates of extinction risk: phylogeny, biology, threat and scale

By Andy Purvis, M. Cardillo, R. Grenyer, B. Collen. 2005

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e4fe0c9ec06d584c300585fc284671b0b76dfae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. D. Jablonski
2. Andy Purvis
3. J. Bielby
4. M. Cardillo
5. J. Vamosi
6. Laura R. Prugh
7. W. Sechrest
8. M. Kauffman

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. D. Jablonski
2. J. Vamosi
3. M. Kauffman
4. William F. Fagan
5. K. Hodges
6. Laura R. Prugh
7. D. Doak
8. D. Keinath

Citations in the corpus

• SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION (2007, methodology): “…and herbaceous plants (Jablonski 1987; Ricklefs and Latham 1992; Brown 1995; Blackburn et al. 2004; Qian and Ricklefs 2004; Hunt et al. 2005, who provided a more robust analytical method than Webb and Gaston 2003 that effectively reverses their results; Purvis et al. 2005; Jablonski and Hunt 2006).”
• Human Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World's Carnivores (2004, background): “Although the extinction risk index itself does not evolve along phylogenies, it is closely associated with biological variables that do, making it necessary to use analyses that control for phylogeny to ensure statistical independence of data points (Jones et al. 2004; Purvis et al. 2000, 2004).”
• A global analysis of traits predicting species sensitivity to habitat fragmentation (2017, background): “Additionally, the breadth of our analysis allowed us to explicitly consider interactions between local landscapes and species characteristics, which are likely to be important (Purvis et al., 2005) but have rarely been tested in a generalizable way.”
• Body size, rarity, and phylogenetic community structure: insights from diving beetle assemblages of Alberta (2006, background): “Determining the conditions that facilitate rare species occurrence will have obvious ramifications for the conservation of biodiversity (Andreasen, 2005; Orme et al., 2005; Purvis et al., 2006).”
• Geographical, temporal and taxonomic biases in insect GBIF data on biodiversity and extinction (2021, background): “Coupled with this, the geographical scale – the scope of the analyses – also affects as the concordance between extinction risk at a local and global level can be low (Purvis et al., 2005).”