Sub-diffractional volume-confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride

By Joshua D. Caldwell, A. Kretinin, Yiguo Chen, Vincenzo Giannini, M. Fogler, Y. Francescato, C. T. Ellis, J. Tischler, C. Woods, A. Giles and 5 more. Nature Communications, 2014

869 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Strongly anisotropic media, where the principal components of the dielectric tensor have opposite signs, are called hyperbolic. Such materials exhibit unique nanophotonic properties enabled by the highly directional propagation of slow-light modes localized at deeply sub-diffractional length scales. While artificial hyperbolic metamaterials have been demonstrated, they suffer from high plasmonic losses and require complex nanofabrication, which in turn induces size-dependent limitations on optical confinement. The low-loss, mid-infrared, natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride is an attractive alternative. Here we report on three-dimensionally confined ‘hyperbolic polaritons’ in boron nitride nanocones that support four series (up to the seventh order) modes in two spectral bands. The resonant modes obey the predicted aspect ratio dependence and exhibit high-quality factors (Q up to 283) in the strong confinement regime (up to λ/86). These observations assert hexagonal boron nitride as a promising platform for studying novel regimes of light–matter interactions and nanophotonic device engineering. Hyperbolic metamaterials exhibit interesting optical phenomena that could provide useful functionalities, if the losses can be reduced. Here Caldwell et al.show that hexagonal boron nitride supports hyperbolic polaritons, presenting a natural alternative to metamaterial systems.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e35bea60ad896cf757835a7b1d14615eb102772

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Phaedon Avouris
  2. Tony Low
  3. F H L Koppens
  4. Luis Martin-Moreno
  5. A. Castellanos-Gómez
  6. Sanjay Krishna
  7. Nicholas X. Fang
  8. T. Heinz

In Civil and Structural Engineering

  1. Phaedon Avouris

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

  1. Luis Martin-Moreno
  2. Sanjay Krishna
  3. Tony Low
  4. Nicholas X. Fang
  5. Phaedon Avouris
  6. G. Chinna R. Devarapu
  7. Ganapathi Subramania
  8. Joshua D. Caldwell

Citations in the corpus