Handbook of the psychology of interviewing

By A. Memon, Ray Bull. 2000

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e186eb9b7f7ba3dddbe229d2e757a1d8454df68

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. I. Hershkowitz
2. A. Jowett
3. M. Lamb
4. Y. Orbach
5. Elizabeth Peel
6. Phillip W. Esplin
7. Dvora Horowitz
8. Rachel L. Shaw

Citations in the corpus

• A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: a review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. (2007, background): “…provide accurate information about their past experiences, while others have paid special attention to their suggestibility (see reviews in the last decade by Jones, 2003; Lamb, Orbach, Warren, Esplin, & Hershkowitz, 2006; Memon & Bull, 1999; Pipe, Lamb, Orbach, & Esplin, 2004; Poole & Lamb, 1998).”
• Online Interviewing in Psychology: Reflections on the Process (2011, background): “…reason why a focus on rapport online is particularly important is that the interpersonal skills and nonverbal cues often used by qualitative psychologists to facilitate the delicate interaction involved (Hargie & Tourish 1999; Payne 1999) do not translate straightforwardly to an online setting.”