How Do Right-to-Carry Laws Affect Crime Rates? Coping with Ambiguity Using Bounded-Variation Assumptions

By Charles F. Manski, John V. Pepper. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2015

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Despite dozens of studies, research on crime has struggled to reach consensus about the impact of right-to-carry (RTC) gun laws. With this in mind, we formalize and apply a class of bounded-variation assumptions that flexibly restrict the degree to which outcomes may vary across time and space. Using these assumptions, we present empirical analysis of the effect of RTC laws on violent and property crimes in Virginia, Maryland, and Illinois. Imposing specific assumptions that we believe worthy of consideration, we find that RTC laws increase some crimes, decrease other crimes, and have effects that vary over time for others.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e0ea72c360c8cf185d5e96c4b86c3e1ddba3455

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. X. d'Haultfoeuille
  2. C. Chaisemartin

In Health

  1. X. d'Haultfoeuille
  2. C. Chaisemartin

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. C. Chaisemartin
  2. X. d'Haultfoeuille
  3. Alexandre Poirier
  4. Matthew A. Masten
  5. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna
  6. Brantly Callaway

Citations in the corpus