Sexual Double Standard: A Review of the Literature Between 2001 and 2010

By Gabriela Sagebin Bordini, T. M. Sperb. Sexuality & Culture, 2012

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e084dd70d1490f83ec738189713a47b63f6a3b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Y. Ruvalcaba
2. Asia A. Eaton
3. Peter Glick
4. Nurit Shnabel

In General Health Professions

1. Asia A. Eaton

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nurit Shnabel
2. Y. Ruvalcaba
3. R. Kahalon
4. Asia A. Eaton
5. Peter Glick
6. Orly Bareket
7. Susan T. Fiske
8. Laurie A. Rudman

Citations in the corpus

• Nonconsensual pornography among U.S. adults: A sexual scripts framework on victimization, perpetration, and health correlates for women and men. (2020, background): “Further, sexual scripts contribute to polarized attitudes about men’s and women’s sexual experiences, also known as sexual double standards (Bordini & Sperb, 2013; Crawford & Popp, 2003).”
• The Madonna-Whore Dichotomy: Men Who Perceive Women's Nurturance and Sexuality as Mutually Exclusive Endorse Patriarchy and Show Lower Relationship Satisfaction (2018, background): “Because premarital sex is widely accepted nowadays for Western women (Bordini and Sperb 2013), we assessed the acceptability of sexual intercourse only at two early dating stages for which double standards still exist (Crawford and Popp 2003; Sprecher and Hatfield 1996).”