Traditional, state-of-the-art and future thermal building insulation materials and solutions Prope

By B. P. Jelle. 2011

1,128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The advantages and disadvantages of the thermal building insulation materials and solutions have been treated. Both traditional, state-of-the-art and possible materials and solutions beyond these have been investigated. Examples of these may be mineral wool, expanded polystyrene, extruded polystyrene, polyurethane, vacuum insulation panels, gas insulation panels, aerogels, and future possibilities like vacuum insulation materials, nano insulation materials and dynamic insulation materials. Various properties, requirements and possibilities have been compared and studied. Among these are thermal conductivity, perforation vulnerability, building site adaptability and cuttability, mechanical strength, fire protection, fume emission during fire, robustness, climate ageing durability, resistance towards freezing/thawing cycles, water resistance, costs and environmental impact. Currently, there exist no single insulation material or solution capable of fulfilling all the requirements with respect to the most crucial properties. That is, for the buildings of today and the near future, several insulation materials and solutions are used and will have to be used depending on the exact circumstances and specifications. As of today, new materials and solutions like e.g. vacuum insulation panels are emerging, but only slowly introduced in the building sector partly due to their short track record. Therefore it will be of major importance to know the limitations and possibilities of all the insulation materials and solutions, i.e. their advantages and disadvantages. In this respect new conceptual thermal building insulation materials are also discussed.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Environmental Engineering, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2df42fa9bd515ebde8f42917ff9c246548d60def

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

  1. F. Pacheco-Torgal
  2. P. Lacroix
  3. R. Muthuraj
  4. Clement Lacoste
  5. A. Bergeret
  6. W. Hittini
  7. Basim Abu‐Jdayil
  8. Muzamil A. Hassan

In Environmental Engineering

  1. F. Pacheco-Torgal
  2. P. Lacroix
  3. R. Muthuraj
  4. Clement Lacoste
  5. A. Bergeret
  6. W. Hittini
  7. Basim Abu‐Jdayil
  8. Muzamil A. Hassan

In Spectroscopy

  1. F. Pacheco-Torgal
  2. P. Lacroix
  3. R. Muthuraj
  4. Clement Lacoste
  5. A. Bergeret
  6. W. Hittini
  7. Basim Abu‐Jdayil
  8. Muzamil A. Hassan

Citations in the corpus