Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils.

By Stefano Manzoni, Philip G. Taylor, Andreas Richter, Amilcare Porporato, G. Ågren. New Phytologist, 2012

1,541 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2de676376f0277f00417e311d4ee84e685b599a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Environmental Chemistry

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Patterns and mechanisms of responses by soil microbial communities to nitrogen addition (2017, background): “In contrast, for the substrate with a low N content, more C tends to be respired rather than stored in soils as stable SOM (Manzoni et al., 2012; Cotrufo et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2014).”
Bacterial rather than fungal community composition is associated with microbial activities and nutrient-use efficiencies in a paddy soil with short-term organic amendments (2018, background): “Manzoni et al. (2012) revealed that an increase in CUE promotes potential C storage in soils, while a decrease in CUE might explain observed increases in soil respiration.”
The Microbial Efficiency‐Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? (2013, background): “, 2006) and with other environmental factors (Manzoni et al., 2012).”
Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage (2023, background): “that microorganisms in warm environments should reduce allocation to biosynthesis because of the increased energy requirements for metabolism 14 .”
Stoichiometric imbalances between terrestrial decomposer communities and their resources: mechanisms and implications of microbial adaptations to their resources (2014, background): “Whereas the stoichiometric regulation of CUE has been recently reviewed in detail (Manzoni et al., 2012; Sinsabaugh et al., 2013), very little is known about regulation of microbial NUE, and even less about microbial phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) in soils.”
Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modelling. (2013, methodology): “The maximal value of CUE (CUEmax) is fixed by thermodynamic constraints (Roels 1980), but the realised CUE of microbial communities varies with environmental conditions, substrate availability, stoichiometry, and the physiological state and composition of the community (Manzoni et al. 2012).”
Integrating plant litter quality, soil organic matter stabilization, and the carbon saturation concept (2015, background): “The first approach is highly preferable because differences in plant structure/physiognomy and mass of litter-C inputs can have a greater effect on SOM stabilization than litter quality by altering other factors that influence SOM stabilization such as water availability and temperature (Manzoni et ”
Eco-enzymatic stoichiometry and enzymatic vectors reveal differential C, N, P dynamics in decaying litter along a land-use gradient (2016, background): “Finally, shifts in enzyme ratios also can be accompanied by changes in element-use efficiency (Sinsabaugh and Follstad Shah 2012; Manzoni et al. 2012; Mooshammer et al. 2014b).”
Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial nutrient acquisition in tropical soils (2013, background): “55 (Manzoni et al. 2012).”