Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes.
By V. Di Lollo, James T. Enns, Ronald A. Rensink. 2000
773 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science & Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Nicholas B. Turk-Browne
- Julie D. Golomb
- Talis Bachmann
- Huibert Steven Scholte
- Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
- Marvin M. Chun
- Victor A. F. Lamme
- Randall C. O’Reilly
In Neuroscience
- Talis Bachmann
- Nicholas B. Turk-Browne
- Julie D. Golomb
- Marvin M. Chun
- Randall C. O’Reilly
- Clayton Hickey
- Victor A. F. Lamme
- Andrew Zisserman
In Cognitive Science & Psychology
- Talis Bachmann
- Nicholas B. Turk-Browne
- Julie D. Golomb
- Marvin M. Chun
- Randall C. O’Reilly
- Clayton Hickey
- Victor A. F. Lamme
- Andrew Zisserman
Citations in the corpus
- Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attention (2021, background): “There is widespread evidence that it plays an important role in human vision (e.g. Felleman & Essen 1991; Olshausen et al. 1993; Lollo et al. 2000), which is characterized by limited bandwidth input streams (Wolfe et al., 2006).”
- To See or Not to See: Pre-stimulus Alpha Phase Predicts Visual Awareness (2009, background): “For instance, at a maximally effective masking stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 50 ms, a metacontrast backwards mask is not always effective in diminishing the visibility of a preceding target (Breitmeyer and Ogmen, 2000; Di Lollo et al., 2000).”
- A hidden ambiguity of the term “feedback” in its use as an explanatory mechanism for psychophysical visual phenomena (2014, background): “It is also possible that the standard views of reentrance (e.g., Di Lollo et al., 2000; Lamme and Roelfsema, 2000) may be valid in some empirical instances, difficult to ascertain in some other cases, and incompatible with the neurophysiological realities of processing in different experiments.”
- The Limits of Feedforward Vision: Recurrent Processing Promotes Robust Object Recognition when Objects Are Degraded (2012, background): “Although the present experiment was not explicitly designed to rule out this feedforward explanation, this explanation is unlikely, especially considering there is little neural evidence that interchannel inhibition exists as a masking mechanism (Fahrenfort et al., 2007; Enns & Di Lollo, 2000).”
- A taxonomy of external and internal attention. (2011, positive): “…and working memory is thought to involve the fronto-parieto-temporal network (Marois et al. 2000), especially synchronization between these brain mechanisms (Dehaene et al. 2003, Gross et al. 2004), and reentrant processes (see Di Lollo et al. 2000 for related substitution masking effects).”
- View from the Top: Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System (2002, neutral): “…backward masking the US-Israel Bi-National Science Foundation (BSF).is due to reentry signals arriving at low levels after the input has changed (Di Lollo et al., 2000) and that versatile References input filters are dynamically reconfigured by prefrontal cortex to handle incoming stimuli with…”
- Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex (2007, background): “Four-dot masking depends on attention being directed elsewhere and increases with increasing set size (Enns, 2004; Di Lollo et al., 2000).”