Physiological and Molecular Response of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) to Nanoparticle Cerium and Indium Oxide Exposure

By Chuanxin Ma, S. Chhikara, B. Xing, Craig Musante, J. White, O. Dhankher. 2013

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geochemistry and Petrology, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ddc93f7a2b19c06b13d7c5836de4bbda3823dc9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geochemistry and Petrology

1. J. White
2. M. Al-Whaibi
3. M. H. Siddiqui
4. Ying-qing Deng
5. F. Mohammad
6. B. Xing

In Materials Chemistry

1. J. White
2. Ying-qing Deng
3. B. Xing
4. M. Al-Whaibi
5. M. H. Siddiqui
6. F. Mohammad

Citations in the corpus

• Interactions between engineered nanomaterials and agricultural crops: implications for food safety (2014, background): “Specifically, NP In2O3 exposure increased glutathione synthase (GS) transcript production by 3.8−4.6-fold whereas nano CeO2 yielded only a 2-fold increase (Ma et al., 2013).”
• Nanotechnology and Plant Sciences (2015, background): “Ma et al. (2013b) also reported the uptake and accumulation of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) were plant species dependent, with the observed internalization of nZVI by poplar root cells while not by cattail (Typha latifolia) root cells. Upward transport from roots to shoots was not observed for ”
• An overview on manufactured nanoparticles in plants: Uptake, translocation, accumulation and phytotoxicity. (2017, background): “Similarly, CeO2NPs caused a decrease in chlorophyll 231 M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED 11 production by 60 and 85%at concentrations 1,000 and 2,000ppm, respectively (Ma et al., 2013).”