Handling “Don't Know” Survey Responses: The Case of the Slovenian Plebiscite

By Donald B. Rubin, Hal S. Stern, Vasja Vehovar. 1995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Sensitivity analysis for incomplete contingency tables: the Slovenian plebiscite case (2001, background): “Table 2: Estimates of the proportion 0 attending the plebiscite and voting for independence, as presented in Rubin, Stern, and Vehovar (1995).”
Random Effects Models for Longitudinal Data (2010, background): “A discussion of this phenomenon in the survey context has been given in Rubin, Stern, and Vehovar (1995).”
Analyzing incomplete longitudinal clinical trial data. (2004, background): “A discussion of this phenomenon in the survey context has been given in Rubin, Stern, and Vehovar (1995).”
Every missingness not at random model has a missingness at random counterpart with equal fit (2008, methodology): “In Section 5 we apply the ideas that are developed to data from the Slovenian public opinion survey, which have been analysed before by Rubin et al. (1995) and Molenberghs et al. (2001).”
Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years (1996, background): “…of misguided imputation, which is not even first-moment proper, take bootstrap or jackknife replicates and assume inferential validity despite badly biased estimates of scientific estimands (see, e.g., Rubin 1994, and Efron 1994, for differing views concerning the acceptability of such answers).”
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models: Understanding and summarizing the fitted models (2006, result): “Now turning to the Ruel et al. (1997) study, we first see that rates of diarrhea— for control and treated children both—are much higher than in the previous study: 8 episodes per hundred days, which corresponds to 30 episodes per year, more than 20 times the rate in the earlier group. We are clearly”