Primate ecology and social organization

By T. H. Clutton-Brock, P. Harvey. 2009

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2dd852d6f10974abf93766e6c8bfe3c71c9f4a4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Comparative Feeding Ecology of Sympatric Microcebus berthae and M. murinus (2008, background): “The relationships between dietary preferences for certain food sources of highly different distribution patterns and quality are an important factor explaining inter- and intraspecific variation in ecology and behavior of primates (Clutton-Brock 1974; Clutton-Brock and Harvey 1977; van Schaik 1989; ”
The social dynamics of southern resident killer whales and conservation implications for this endangered population (2009, background): “Sociality reflects the balance between the selective forces causing and maintaining social groups, and the detriments associated with group living (Crook & Gartlan 1966; Alexander 1974; Clutton-Brock & Harvey 1977; Bertram 1978; Lott 1984; Packer et al. 1990; Gowans et al. 2007).”
Fissioning minimizes ranging costs in spider monkeys: a multiple-level approach (2009, unknown): “…better prevention of infanticide, and increased food detection), intragroup feeding competition is probably the most significant cost (Alexander 1974; Clutton-Brock and Harvey 1977; Terborgh and Janson 1986; van Schaik and van Hooff 1983; Dunbar 1988; Janson and Goldsmith 1995; Koenig 2002).”
Sexual size dimorphism in the American rubyspot: male body size predicts male competition and mating success (2007, background): “Thus, large size may be advantageous for males in polygynous species ( Clutton-Brock & Harvey 1977; Owens & Hartley 1998).”
General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi‐trait models for continuous and categorical characters (2010, methodology): “To accommodate this, we show how the classic nested taxonomic model (Clutton-Brock & Harvey, 1977) can be combined with the phylogenetic mixed model (Lynch, 1991; Housworth et al., 2004) to give a flexible framework with which to model phylogenetic dependence.”
Time allocation and the evolution of group size (2008, unknown): “Similarly, diet type influences resource requirements, and it may affect time-allocation patterns or group size (Clutton-Brock 1975; Clutton-Brock & Harvey 1977; Janson & Goldsmith 1995; Williamson & Dunbar 1999; Nunn & van Schaik 2002).”
Group territoriality and the benefits of sociality in the African lion, Panthera leo (2009, background): “…party sizes in territory border areas where they may encounter opposing groups (Bauer 1980; Wilson 2001), and group sizes of primates and ungulates are often larger in open habitat (Jarman 1974; Clutton-Brock & Harvey 1977), where animals are more visible and more vulnerable to attack (Watts 1990).”
Costs and benefits of group living in primates: group size effects on behaviour and demography (2008, unknown): “(1) Janson & Goldsmith (1995); (2) Rowe (1996); (3) Clutton-Brock & Harvey (1977) ; (4) Chapman & Chapman (2000).”