Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection

By M. Mönkkönen, R. Härdling, Jukka T. Forsman, J. Tuomi. Evolutionary Ecology, 2004

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2dc9d3ad936cfad6ecada49731937fe0dfe7a169

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Nikita Chernetsov
2. Jukka T. Forsman
3. M. Mönkkönen
4. R. Swaisgood
5. J. Stamps
6. R. Harris
7. J. Reed
8. Andrew Sih

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Nikita Chernetsov
2. Jukka T. Forsman
3. M. Mönkkönen
4. J. Stamps
5. R. Swaisgood
6. R. Harris
7. J. Reed

Citations in the corpus

• Acoustic information as a distant cue for habitat recognition by nocturnally migrating passerines during landfall (2008, background): “Individuals gain a larger benefit when they make the correct habitat assessment quickly (Thomson et al. 2003; Mettke-Hofmann and Gwinner 2004 ).”
• Habitat selection by nocturnal passerine migrants en route: mechanisms and results (2006, methodology): “During and after arrival at stopover, migrants select appropriate habitats in accordance with their innate preferences and functional morphology (Bairlein 1983, 1992), foraging strategies and food resource distribution (Hutto 1985a; Martin and Karr 1986; Chernetsov 1998; Chernetsov and Titov 2003)”
• Behavioral barriers to non-migratory movements of birds (2002, background): “Conspecifi c attraction, and even heterospecifi c attraction (Mönkkönen et al. 1996, 1999), also may attract birds across an otherwise unsuitable habitat gap.”
• Someplace like home: Experience, habitat selection and conservation biology (2007, background): “, 2004), or the presence of heterospecifics whose resource requirements are comparable to those of the subject species (Monkkonen et al., 1999; Thomson et al., 2003; Parejo et al., 2004).”
• Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions (2008, background): “Recent theoretical studies predict that optimum conditions relative to competitor density occur at some intermediate density (Mönkkönen et al. 1999; Fletcher 2006; see also Forsman et al. 2002).”
• Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review (2002, methodology): “…used analytical modeling to analyze ecological conditions, which may favor a habitat selection process where later arriving individuals (colonists) use the presence of earlier established species (residents) as a cue to profitable breeding sites (heterospecific attraction) (Mönkkönen et al. 1999).”