Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index.

By R. Schiffman, M. Christianson, G. Jacobsen, J. Hirsch, Brenda L. Reis. A M A Archives of Ophthalmology, 2000

3,023 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Dermatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2dc311196c9b498e2b379452b7e6bc5cf055858d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. F. Medeiros
2. Robert N. Weinreb
3. Eamon W. Leung

Citations in the corpus

• TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report (2017, neutral): “Interestingly, dryness is not always queried in DED questionnaires [421].”
• Prevalence of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients (2008, methodology): “The OSDI questionnaire was designed as a screening survey to assess symptoms and their impact on visionrelated functions.(14) This questionnaire has been reported to have excellent test-retest reliability and to effectively discriminate between normal, mild to moderate, and severe OSD as defined by ”