Reaping What You Sow: An Empirical Analysis of International Patent Harmonization

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Strategic Intellectual Property Rights Policy and North-South Technology Transfer (2007, background): “4 Recent empirical work by McCalmen (2001) also suggests that the South has been worse off with the TRIPS agreement using the resulting transfers of income from the South to the North as evidence.”
Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data (2006, unknown): “Analysis of detailed firm-level data reveals that royalty payments for intangibles transferred to affiliates increase at the time of reforms, as do affiliate R&D expenditures and total levels of foreign patent applications.”
The role of patent protection in (clean/green) technology transfer (2010, unknown): “ McCalman (2001) develops a growth model of bilateral technology transfer and tries to quantify the welfare effects of patent harmonization due to the TRIPS agreement.”
Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase Innovation (2015, background): “McCalman (2001) has shown how increased IPRs result in wealth transfers from”
Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Development (2011, unknown): “Since nM nN = g , equation (36) implies that a typical multinational must have higher relative sales compared to a Northern rm (i.”