Influence of drought, salt stress and abscisic acid on the resistance of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and Oidium neolycopersici

By E. Achuo, E. Prinsen, M. Höfte. 2006

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses (2009, background): “For example, the ABA-deficient sitiens mutant of tomato showed more resistance to B. cinerea (Audenaert et al. 2002), Pst (Thaler and Bostock 2004), Oidium neolycopersici (Achuo et al. 2006) and Erwinia chrysanthemi (Asselbergh et al. 2008) than wild type plants.”
Plant Responses to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stress: Molecular Mechanisms (2014, background): “The association between abiotic and biotic stress is also possible [13], as demonstrated by the reduced infection of tomato by Botrytis cinerea and Oidium neolycopersici following the application of drought stress [37].”
Impact of Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses on Plant Growth and Avenues for Crop Improvement by Exploiting Physio-morphological Traits (2017, background): “…Verticillium albo-atrum (causal agent of verticillium wilt), and Pseudomonas syringae (causal agent of bacterial speck disease), respectively (Achuo et al., 2006; Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org 3 April 2017 | Volume 8 | Article 537 FIGURE 1 | Schematic representation of…”