Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies

936 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

EP-SPARQL: a unified language for event processing and stream reasoning (2011, methodology): “We assume the reader to be familiar with RDF and SPARQL; For a thorough introduction to these formalisms see, e.g. [13].”
Explaining Trained Neural Networks with Semantic Web Technologies: First Steps (2017, background): “Semantic Web [4,12] is concerned with data sharing, discovery, integration, and reuse.”
HermiT: An OWL 2 Reasoner (2014, methodology): “We assume the reader to be familiar with OWL, description logics [12, 22], and the correspondence between the OWL and the description logic syntax [14].”
Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey (2013, background): “Comprehensive and extensive amounts of information on semantic technology are available in [130], [131], [132].”
Knowledge Graphs (2020, neutral): “3 Reasoning Given two graphs, deciding if the first entails the second – per all of the features in Tables 2–4 – is undecidable: no (finite) algorithm for such entailment can exist that halts on all inputs with the correct true/false answer [53].”