Resonantly driven coherent oscillations in a solid-state quantum emitter
By E. Flagg, A. Muller, J. Robertson, S. Founta, Dennis Deppe, M. Xiao, Wenquan Ma, Gregory J. Salamo, C. Shih. 2009
293 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d720e0b8597a915b9e5a7a4732bb78783369361
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Citations in the corpus
- Cascaded single-photon emission from the Mollow triplet sidebands of a quantum dot (2011, methodology): “The signal around zero delay exhibits clear antibunching with a normalized value of g((2))(t)1⁄4 0.”
- Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures (2013, unknown): “…for the photon autocorrelation function is obtained by extending the textbook calculation of Scully and Zubairy (2001) to include dephasing (Flagg et al., 2009), g(2)(τ) = (43) 1− e−(3γ/4+γdp/2)τ ( cos(µτ) + 3γ + 2γdp 4µ sin(µτ) ) , where µ = √ 4 |Ωp|2 − (γ/4− γdp/2)2 is the effective Rabi…”
- Non-resonant dot–cavity coupling and its potential for resonant single-quantum-dot spectroscopy (2009, methodology): “The experimental data has been fitted by a theoretical model [21] to describe the emission saturation of a resonantly excited two-level system (see also methods section).”
- Quantum dot Rabi rotations beyond the weak exciton–phonon coupling regime (2010, background): “Experimentally, it is generally the excitonic population ρXX that is measured, through photocurrent detection [8, 11] or microcavity-asissted photon emission [13, 14], for example.”