Do explanations make VQA models more predictable to a human?
By Arjun Chandrasekaran, Viraj Prabhu, Deshraj Yadav, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Devi Parikh. 2018
105 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A rich line of research attempts to make deep neural networks more transparent by generating human-interpretable ‘explanations’ of their decision process, especially for interactive tasks like Visual Question Answering (VQA). In this work, we analyze if existing explanations indeed make a VQA model — its responses as well as failures — more predictable to a human. Surprisingly, we find that they do not. On the other hand, we find that human-in-the-loop approaches that treat the model as a black-box do.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Multimodal Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Mohit Bansal
- Yejin Choi
- Noah A. Smith
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Percy Liang
- Graham Neubig
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Jianfeng Gao
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Mohit Bansal
- Song-Chun Zhu
- Luc Van Gool
- Trevor Darrell
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Alan L. Yuille
- Yejin Choi
In Multimodal Learning
- Robik Shrestha
- Christopher Kanan
- Ali Farhadi
- Kushal Kafle
- Rowan Zellers
- Yejin Choi
- Yonatan Bisk
- Noah A. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationales (2020, background): “…has a rich history in machine learning inter-pretability as a reliable measure of rationale quality from the lens of utility to an end-user (Kim et al., 2016; Chandrasekaran et al., 2018; Hase and Bansal, 2020; Yeung et al., 2020; Poursabzi-Sangdeh et al., 2021; Rajagopal et al., 2021, i.a. ).”
- From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning (2018, background): “This has motivated work in having models provide explanations for their behavior, in the form of a natural language sentence [31, 9, 41] or an attention map [32, 35, 37].”
- Interpreting CNNs via Decision Trees (2018, background): “[2, 21, 9, 4] discussed the definition of interpretability from different perspectives concerning different tasks.”
- Evaluating Explanations: How Much Do Explanations from the Teacher Aid Students? (2020, background): “Conducting large-scale human studies poses several challenges, including the considerable financial expense and the logistical challenge of recruiting and retaining participants for unusually long tasks (Chandrasekaran et al., 2018).”
- What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations (2020, background): “Other media such as television, movies, and science fiction can also have effects on perceptions of AI [28,101,138].”
- On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection (2018, background): “Concurrently, several recent studies have also examined how explanations relate to human performance [10, 23].”
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance (2020, background): “As a result, various studies have evaluated the effect of explanations from different dimensions, including whether the explanation improves users’ trust on the AI [34, 68] or enables users to simulate the model predictions [13, 55], or assisting developers to debug and train a better ML model [7, 3”
- Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think (2025, unknown): “It measures whether humans can build precise and generalizable mental models of how the model processes various inputs through observing its CoTs (Doshi-Velez and Kim, 2017; Chandrasekaran et al., 2018; Hase and Bansal, 2020; Chen et al., 2024).”
- Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies (2021, methodology): “Model uncertainty Classification confidence (or probability) [10, 13, 21, 22, 43, 60, 68, 73, 86, 87, 144, 155], flag low confidence [90], uncertainty distribution (regression) [101] Local feature importance Coefficients [16, 28, 39, 43, 49, 55, 80, 81, 86, 87, 94, 106, 111, 125, 128, 143], attentio”
- Challenges and Prospects in Vision and Language Research (2019, background): “Currently, there is no reliable evidence that such explanations actually make the model more interpretable, but there is some evidence of the contrary (Chandrasekaran et al., 2018).”
- Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior? (2020, methodology): “Simulation tests have been carried out before, but no study to date has isolated the effect of explanations on simulatability (Ribeiro et al., 2018; Chandrasekaran et al., 2018; Nguyen, 2018; Bang et al., 2019).”